Pixel gun 3d and Mojang crazy copyright issues

Do you think Mojang should have copyright on crazy things

  • Yes

    Votes: 5 22.7%

  • No

    Votes: 17 77.3%
  • Total voters
    22
Nachoboy03

Nachoboy03

New Member
I've noticed that Mojang is getting copyright for crazy things like the gold sword weapon in pixel gun was renamed to golden sword to prevent copyright issues and I've seen other games with weapons named "golden sword"

Check this link and read the article http://pixel-gun-3d.wikia.com/wiki/Golden_Sword
I can understand this because this minecraft is the first game I've seen with endermen and diamond swords (read these articles) http://pixel-gun-3d.wikia.com/wiki/Crystal_Sword
http://pixel-gun-3d.wikia.com/wiki/Parallel_Runner
 
I'm on both sides here.. I do understand that Enderman was a name and mob created from mojang.. But diamond and golden? Your have gotta be kidding me.. Diamond is already a word and golden..
 
Plazma said:
I'm on both sides here.. I do understand that Enderman was a name and mob created from mojang.. But diamond and golden? Your have gotta be kidding me.. Diamond is already a word and golden..
Click to expand...
Really Mojang should be able to copyright what they made as long as it is original to their game

PixelGun3d should be able to use the names diamond and gold pre fixes to weapons
And Mojang should be able to copyright stuff such as endermen and ghasts
 
Last edited:
goldman0102 said:
And also, why did they make psg3 change their bow green?
Click to expand...
Copy right issues read the article but this is different the bow when it was brown looked exactly like the bow in minecraft
http://pixel-gun-3d.wikia.com/wiki/Simple_Bow

Also even if we tried to create a petition to revert the changes we probably don't have enough active members to get enough signatures to revert the changes
(Bow being green,golden prefix instead of gold,crystal instead of diamond)
 
Last edited:
Hmm... Mojang is going copyright crazy... Soon we will not be able to type out minecraft without being sued!
 
LordYulin said:
Yes and I wonder why amount doesn't send people to search up fakes of minecraft. I mean it's so easy to find a fake minecraft online.
Click to expand...
There's no point, because the fakes are making tons of money. If they were to make the amount that pixel gun makes, then they'd actively search those fakes out
 
Nachoboy03 said:
I've noticed that Mojang is getting copyright for crazy things like the gold sword weapon in pixel gun was renamed to golden sword to prevent copyright issues and I've seen other games with weapons named "golden sword"

Check this link and read the article http://pixel-gun-3d.wikia.com/wiki/Golden_Sword
I can understand this because this minecraft is the first game I've seen with endermen and diamond swords (read these articles) http://pixel-gun-3d.wikia.com/wiki/Crystal_Sword
http://pixel-gun-3d.wikia.com/wiki/Parallel_Runner
Click to expand...
So like King doesn't let anybody put the word candy in their game title anymore?
 
The copyright stuff really shouldn't be a bother for anyone here. Yes, they've renamed and remodeled several things to avoid infringement, but I see no problem here. It hasn't affected gameplay at all, just the naming and appearance of things.

In short, why are we making such a big argument about a company making changes to appearance and naming to avoid getting their company shut down by a much bigger, more popular company?
 
They can copyright stuff like mobs they can copyright names but they can copyright (for example the design of a pig) they don't copyright the name they copyright what it looks like... The word "Golden Sword" is un able to copyright but how Mojang designs a golden sword of how it looks is copyrighted so in conclusion if it was called a golden sword thats ok but if it is a golden sword identical to the Mojang design is copyrighted
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top