Armour, and why it should be severely nerfed.

Should armour be nerfed exactly how I suggested???

  • Yes!!!

    Votes: 4 30.8%
  • No!!! (If you choose this than specify how you want armour nerfed)

    Votes: 7 53.8%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 2 15.4%

  • Total voters
    13
I would say dont give penalties to armor because it already costs so much. I would just nerf it to
Wood:1-3
Iron:4-6
Gold:7-9
Crystal:10-12
Ruby:13-15
So the max armor is 30 instead of 50. Why nerf so little? Well first IT COST SO FREAKIN MUCH AND WE SHOULD AT LEAST GET SOME VALUE FROM ALL THAT MONEY AND NOT NERF IT SO HARD UNTIL ITS USELESS!!! And second, because guns now are MUCH stronger than guns last time (you should already know by how much by now). Snipers have enough damage to deal 40 damage in 1 shot and if not, there should be upgrades for them and of course the gravity gun must be nerfed before you nerf armor. All the old guns can still quite easily get 40 damage if you are a good with headshots. And all the new primarys now (hellraiser only) can kill you in like 4 seconds if all your shots are headshots which is about the same kill time compared to last time with the rambos rifle and marksman.

And why you shoudnt nerf armor too much? First nobody would waste their money on armor if its useless and second, all the guns will kill you in less than 1 second, so armor is kinda compulsory to survive in pvp.
If you want an example of what happens when you nerf something too much, thats the dragons breath. It costs sooo much when it was first released and yes it was op but then it got nerfed too much that it is weaker than a rambos rifle and nobody uses it now. People who bought it before will feel that they wasted their money on something useless that they cant even use just because it does too little damage.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top